CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
214 EFps 214 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
73 EFps 83 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+14%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
87 EFps 101 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+16%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 99 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+25%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
99 EFps 108 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+9%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 146,817 user samples
49,113 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 625
97,704 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 76% Zotac(19DA 4520)
Poor: 76% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.7 % 85.3 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps 346 fps Better texture detail.
+27%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps 283 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps 295 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps 188 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+7%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
300 fps 386 fps Better peak texture detail.
+29%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps 298 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps 316 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps 202 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 21,504,541 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % 1.71 % Higher market share.
+26%
Value
Value For Money
67.2 % Better value.
+16%
57.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
131 %
Price
Price (score)
$260 Cheaper.
+26%
$349
Age
Newest
8 Months Slightly more recent.
+11%
9 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps 374 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps 310 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps 342 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps 288 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to NVIDIA’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 6GB 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1365/1680 MHz, GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 336GB/s. At an MRSP of $349 for the Founders Edition, this GPU offers the best value for money amongst the RTX range to date and somewhat redeems NVIDIA from their earlier RTX models (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which offered significantly worse value for money. There are still too few games that support RTX to make this feature particularly relevant to buyers, but on average 60+ FPS @ 1440p for most current games at high settings should be achievable. The 2060 can also be overclocked to eke out a bit more performance. In some locations, the 2060 is currently in a similar price bracket to the GTX 1070 Ti which has a 12% greater effective speed and AMD’s highly overclockable RX Vega 56 which has an 8% greater effective speed. Both alternatives are H2 2017 GPUs that lack RTX but still continue to offer solid performance and value at todays prices. [Jan '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback