Real World Speed
Performance profile from 149,091 user samples
32,559 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 67% MSI(1462 3750)
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
116,532 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B4) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
Poor: 83% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % 101 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
275 fps 406 fps Much better texture detail.
+48%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps 359 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+63%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps 370 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+40%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps 228 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps 470 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+56%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
231 fps 390 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+69%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
278 fps 407 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps 247 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+31%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps 233 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+48%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps 149 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+11%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 106 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+12%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 99 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+41%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps 239 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+33%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps 124 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+11%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 99 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+14%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
273 fps +5% 261 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+10%
90 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps 164 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 19,361,430 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.39 % 2.29 % Much higher market share.
+65%
Value
Value For Money
65 % Better value.
+23%
53 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
115 % More popular.
+20%
96 %
Price
Price (score)
$269 Much cheaper.
+40%
$450
Age
Newest
6 Months Much more recent.
+40%
10 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps 434 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps 342 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+36%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps 382 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps 315 fps Much better reflection handling.
+33%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140AMD RX 580 $169Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX Vega 56 $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback