CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps 262 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps 114 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+33%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps 143 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+44%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps 137 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+47%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps 158 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+32%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 796,679 user samples
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 714
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
76 % 104 % Much faster effective speed.
+37%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
96.9 fps 128 fps Much better lighting effects.
+32%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
98.8 fps 119 fps Better reflection handling.
+20%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
96.9 fps 174 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+80%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
89.4 fps 125 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
104 fps 143 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+38%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
134 fps 170 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
103 fps 187 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+82%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
93.8 fps 136 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+45%
Market Share
Based on 67,448,569 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.86 % 1.06 % Higher market share.
+23%
Value
Value For Money
126 % +2% 123 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % More popular.
+22%
67 %
Price
Price (score)
$143 Cheaper.
+29%
$200
Age
Newest
62 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
66 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
95.9 fps 145 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+51%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.1 fps 113 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
87.6 fps 129 fps Much better texture detail.
+47%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
75.7 fps 105 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+39%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback