Real World Speed
Performance profile from 108,861 user samples
17,438 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% MSI(1462 375A)
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 3750)
Poor: 80% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 613
91,423 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 144% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Asus(1043 8670)
Poor: 83% Great: 144%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
91.7 % 129 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
269 fps 399 fps Much better texture detail.
+48%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps 353 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+61%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
262 fps 363 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+39%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps 224 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
304 fps 466 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+53%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
241 fps 394 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+63%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps 409 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps 248 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+31%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
161 fps 192 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+19%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 149 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+21%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 110 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+26%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78 fps 103 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+32%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
174 fps 251 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+44%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps 123 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+21%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 97 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+15%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+10%
93 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps 175 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+30%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
266 fps +1% 264 fps
Market Share
Based on 17,649,184 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.24 % 2.53 % Hugely higher market share.
+104%
Value
Value For Money
112 % +3% 109 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
80 % 90 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$270 Much cheaper.
+43%
$470
Age
Newest
3 Months Much more recent.
+62%
8 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps 434 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps 344 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+37%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
292 fps 377 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
234 fps 308 fps Much better reflection handling.
+32%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $140Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $274Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback