CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
182 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+6%
171 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
63 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+50%
42 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
73 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+52%
48 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+56%
45 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
85 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+44%
59 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 33,124 user samples
24,148 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 625
8,976 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 44% Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% Zotac(19DA 1556) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 44%
SPEED RANK: 72nd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
41.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
239 fps Much better texture detail.
+55%
154 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+58%
93.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+53%
152 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+50%
113 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+54%
171 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
160 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+67%
95.9 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
248 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+55%
160 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+54%
119 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,549,003 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.9 % Hugely higher market share.
+96%
0.46 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % Slightly better value.
+12%
66.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
143 % More popular.
+29%
111 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $150 Cheaper.
+29%
Age
Newest
7 Months 6 Months Slightly more recent.
+14%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+60%
188 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+58%
147 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
174 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps Much better reflection handling.
+56%
140 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback