CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
188 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+47%
49 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+48%
56 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61%
49 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+46%
69 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 182,145 user samples
113,865 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC7)
Worst Bench: 64% Gigabyte(1458 3FCF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 650
68,280 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% MSI(1462 3800)
Worst Bench: 40% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 40% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
72.6 % Much faster effective speed.
+60%
45.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
93.1 fps Much better lighting effects.
+62%
57.5 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
70.1 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
49.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
77.8 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+55%
50.1 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
101 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+60%
63.1 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
76.9 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
68.6 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
83.3 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+56%
53.4 fps
Market Share
Based on 35,695,279 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.07 % Higher market share.
+11%
0.96 %
Value
Value For Money
75.1 % Slightly better value.
+8%
69.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % +1% 136 %
Price
Price (score)
$229 $155 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
20 Months 19 Months +5%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.9 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+58%
57.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
83.8 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+52%
55.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
79.7 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+52%
52.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84 fps Much better reflection handling.
+56%
53.7 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.5 fps Much better texture detail.
+56%
47.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
71.7 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+53%
46.8 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback