CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
214 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+25%
171 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
73 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+74%
42 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
87 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+81%
48 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+76%
45 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
99 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+68%
59 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,989 user samples
43,811 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC4) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
7,178 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 45% EVGA(3842 1151) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 45%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74 % Much faster effective speed.
+76%
42 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
275 fps Much better texture detail.
+80%
153 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+136%
93.7 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+73%
153 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+56%
113 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+77%
171 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
241 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+151%
96 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+74%
161 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+58%
120 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,955,242 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.38 % Hugely higher market share.
+165%
0.52 %
Value
Value For Money
65 % 66.3 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
132 % More popular.
+17%
113 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 $150 Much cheaper.
+44%
Age
Newest
8 Months 5 Months Much more recent.
+38%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+69%
190 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+70%
148 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
301 fps Much better lighting effects.
+72%
175 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps Much better reflection handling.
+68%
141 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback