Real World Speed
Performance profile from 828,197 user samples
671,374 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 366A)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 8508)
Poor: 45% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 88th / 665
156,823 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 63% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 65th / 665
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
50.7 % 68.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
62.2 fps 91.1 fps Much better lighting effects.
+46%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
72.4 fps 92.3 fps Better reflection handling.
+27%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.1 fps +4% 65.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
62.8 fps 79.1 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
70.1 fps 97.6 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+39%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
97 fps 124 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+28%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
73.4 fps +5% 70.2 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70 fps 84 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+21%
128 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps 120 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+28%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 Fps 81 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+29%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 Fps 76 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+43%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps 183 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+17%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 102 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 Fps 63 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+33%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
189 Fps 306 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+62%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 131 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+8%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 117 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 43,761,670 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % Much higher market share.
+58%
0.86 %
Value
Value For Money
35.4 % 70.4 % Hugely better value.
+99%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 76 % More popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$340 $230 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
81 Months 27 Months Much more recent.
+67%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
70.4 fps 84.7 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
60.4 fps 75.6 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
62.7 fps 76.6 fps Better texture detail.
+22%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54.6 fps 69.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback