UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1660 vs 980-Ti

COMPARE

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Nvidia

Nvidia

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 444,823 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

214,030 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)

Poor: 70% Great: 87%

SPEED RANK: 90^th / 713

230,793 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)

Poor: 62% Great: 73%

SPEED RANK: 105^th / 713


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		79 %	Faster effective speed. +16%		68.3 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	98.6 fps	Slightly better lighting effects. +9%	90.3 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	115 fps	Better reflection handling. +27%	90.8 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	97 fps	Much faster multi rendering. +51%	64.2 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	97.7 fps	Faster NBody calculation. +25%	78.4 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	111 fps	Better peak lighting effects. +14%	97.1 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	132 fps	Slightly better peak reflection handling. +9%	121 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	105 fps	Much faster peak multi rendering. +53%	68.5 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	107 fps	Faster peak NBody calculation. +29%	82.7 fps


CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	196 Fps	Much Better CSGO Fps. +53%	128 Fps
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	121 Fps	+1%	120 Fps
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	81 Fps	+0%	81 Fps
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	80 Fps	Slightly Better GTAV Fps. +5%	76 Fps
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	215 Fps	Better LoL Fps. +18%	183 Fps
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	115 Fps	Better Overwatch Fps. +12%	102 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	82 Fps	Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +29%	63 Fps
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	244 Fps		306 Fps	Better Minecraft Fps. +26%
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	153 Fps	Better DOTA 2 Fps. +17%	131 Fps
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	121 Fps	+3%	117 Fps

Market Share

Based on 68,723,847 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.13 %	0.98 %	Hugely higher market share. +654%
Value Value For Money	41.7 %	77.5 %	Hugely better value. +86%
User Rating UBM User Rating	67 %	76 %	More popular. +13%
Price Price (score)	$449	$209	Much cheaper. +53%


Age Newest	114 Months		68 Months	Much more recent. +40%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	113 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +33%	84.8 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	97.4 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +31%	74.6 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	100 fps	Much better texture detail. +32%	75.7 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	87.9 fps	Faster complex splatting. +26%	70 fps

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. ^{[May '15 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. ^{[Mar '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback