Real World Speed
Performance profile from 133,410 user samples
120,231 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 58% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 621
13,179 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% EVGA(3842 1167)
Worst Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 2543)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 44th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
95.7 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
79.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
318 fps Much better texture detail.
+35%
236 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+31%
146 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
231 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
195 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
168 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
370 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+40%
264 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+40%
152 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
324 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
245 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
181 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
199 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+41%
142 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps +5% 117 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+9%
74 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+9%
73 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
217 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+21%
180 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+15%
100 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+32%
63 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
246 fps 282 fps Slightly Better Minecraft fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 19,221,788 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.6 % 0.83 % Much higher market share.
+38%
Value
Value For Money
47.3 % 85.7 % Hugely better value.
+81%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % Much more popular.
+74%
68 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $220 Much cheaper.
+54%
Age
Newest
51 Months 5 Months Hugely more recent.
+90%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
356 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+19%
300 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
320 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
230 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
302 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9%
277 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
280 fps Better reflection handling.
+30%
216 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $233Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback