Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,467 user samples
117,231 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3230) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 621
21,236 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% EVGA(3842 1167)
Worst Bench: 60% EVGA(3842 1167)
Poor: 60% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.3 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
65.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
326 fps Much better texture detail.
+38%
237 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+31%
147 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
233 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
167 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
265 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+41%
152 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
326 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
245 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
181 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+54%
127 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps +4% 119 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+10%
73 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+15%
70 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
218 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+20%
181 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+12%
103 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+37%
60 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
242 fps 283 fps Better Minecraft fps.
+17%
Market Share
Based on 20,740,869 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % 0.95 % Much higher market share.
+76%
Value
Value For Money
38.7 % 70.7 % Hugely better value.
+83%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % 136 % More popular.
+30%
Price
Price (score)
$480 $220 Much cheaper.
+54%
Age
Newest
53 Months 6 Months Hugely more recent.
+89%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+21%
298 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
320 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
230 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
315 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+12%
280 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
217 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback