CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
278 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
225 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
107 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+55%
69 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
132 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+55%
85 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
130 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+59%
82 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
152 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+48%
103 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 82,731 user samples
43,079 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB; MSI Gaming X
Worst Bench: 95% MSI(1462 C726)
Poor: 95% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 627
39,652 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 76% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 76% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
111 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
85.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
446 fps Much better lighting effects.
+54%
290 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
374 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+104%
183 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
380 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
325 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
487 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+39%
350 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
398 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+106%
193 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
412 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
370 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,314,659 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.2 % Hugely higher market share.
+358%
0.48 %
Value
Value For Money
52.7 % 53 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
114 % +2% 112 %
Price
Price (score)
$500 $380 Cheaper.
+24%
Age
Newest
4 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
27 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
399 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+65%
242 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
521 fps 571 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+10%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
257 fps 304 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+18%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
369 fps Much better reflection handling.
+63%
227 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
465 fps 484 fps +4%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
240 fps 288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback