CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+29%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+69%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+86%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+84%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+69%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 489,079 user samples
375,456 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 133% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 651
113,623 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 1067) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
123 % Much faster effective speed.
+71%
71.9 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
152 fps Much better lighting effects.
+65%
91.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Much better reflection handling.
+66%
92.6 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
183 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+178%
65.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
132 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
79.9 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
165 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
98.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
201 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+61%
125 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
199 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+167%
74.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
141 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+65%
85.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 36,087,486 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.88 % Hugely higher market share.
+164%
1.09 %
Value
Value For Money
57.1 % 74.1 % Better value.
+30%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
178 % More popular.
+29%
138 %
Price
Price (score)
$510 $230 Much cheaper.
+55%
Age
Newest
16 Months More recent.
+20%
20 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+96%
86.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
124 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+61%
77.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
150 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+95%
76.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
114 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+66%
68.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback