Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+29%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+69%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+86%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+84%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+69%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 894,396 user samples
663,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 105% Dell(1028 C723) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 713
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % Much faster effective speed.
+69%
68.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
150 fps Much better lighting effects.
+66%
90.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
90.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+183%
64.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
78.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+69%
97.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+72%
121 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+186%
68.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+66%
82.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,774,968 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.31 % Hugely higher market share.
+90%
0.69 %
Value
Value For Money
70.7 % 77.5 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % More popular.
+14%
76 %
Price
Price (score)
$387 $209 Much cheaper.
+46%
Age
Newest
64 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
68 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+99%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+64%
74.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
148 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+96%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
115 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+64%
70 fps

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback