CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
262 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+14%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
114 EFps +4% 110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
143 EFps +4% 138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
137 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
158 EFps +1% 157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 733,025 user samples
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 715
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 715
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
104 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
98.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
128 fps +3% 124 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
119 fps 139 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
174 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+47%
118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps 140 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
133 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+53%
122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
136 fps 151 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 67,936,730 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.04 % Hugely higher market share.
+215%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % 155 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
68 % More popular.
+17%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$200 $150 Cheaper.
+25%
Age
Newest
68 Months 60 Months More recent.
+12%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
145 fps 229 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+58%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
113 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+15%
98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
129 fps 205 fps Much better texture detail.
+59%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
105 fps Faster complex splatting.
+11%
94.3 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback