CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
262 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+14%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
114 EFps +4% 110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
143 EFps +4% 138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
137 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
158 EFps +1% 157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 430,127 user samples
246,680 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 118% EVGA(3842 2173)
Worst Bench: 87% Asus(1043 8670)
Poor: 87% Great: 118%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 639
183,447 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 99% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % 106 % +1%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
370 fps 393 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
357 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+49%
240 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
364 fps 402 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+10%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
430 fps 450 fps +5%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
397 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
247 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
408 fps 428 fps +5%
Market Share
Based on 31,327,015 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.78 % 2.47 % Much higher market share.
+39%
Value
Value For Money
55.7 % 64.4 % Better value.
+16%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 125 % More popular.
+17%
Price
Price (score)
$450 $391 Cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
21 Months 13 Months Much more recent.
+38%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
349 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+13%
308 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
468 fps 829 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+77%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
249 fps 381 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+53%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps +4% 295 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
400 fps 736 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+84%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps 368 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+63%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $330Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback