CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
263 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+21%
217 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
99 EFps +2% 97 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
122 EFps +3% 119 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
122 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
113 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
139 EFps 139 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 196,205 user samples
152,729 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 95% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 95% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 628
43,476 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 628
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
108 % +2% 106 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
383 fps 398 fps +4%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
361 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
238 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
370 fps 398 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
433 fps 440 fps +2%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
386 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+57%
246 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
406 fps 425 fps +5%
Market Share
Based on 22,444,754 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.03 % 2.42 % Higher market share.
+19%
Value
Value For Money
56.6 % 65 % Slightly better value.
+15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % 118 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$450 $385 Slightly cheaper.
+14%
Age
Newest
13 Months 5 Months Much more recent.
+62%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
341 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+11%
308 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps 854 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+82%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps 377 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+54%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
314 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+6%
295 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
408 fps 769 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+88%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps 361 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback