COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
Game EFps  
+18%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		282 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+23% 		229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		128 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+16% 		110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		170 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+23% 		138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		151 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+19% 		127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		169 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8% 		157 EFps
Effective Speed 
+26%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 571,332 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
316,424 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Sapphire(174B A500) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 37A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 713
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		124 % Faster effective speed.
+26% 		98.3 %
Average Score 
+28%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		165 fps Much better lighting effects.
+33% 		124 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		171 fps Better reflection handling.
+23% 		139 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		181 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+53% 		118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		146 fps +4% 140 fps
Overclocked Score 
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		185 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+39% 		133 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		229 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+57% 		146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		193 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+58% 		122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		158 fps +5% 151 fps
Value & Sentiment 
+29%
Market Share
Based on 68,676,573 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.68 % Hugely higher market share.
+89% 		0.36 %
Value
Value For Money 		108 % Better value.
+24% 		87.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		63 % Slightly more popular.
+7% 		59 %
Price
Price (score) 		$270 $266 +2%
Nice To Haves 
+2%
Age
Newest 		73 Months 64 Months More recent.
+12%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		191 fps 229 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		133 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+35% 		98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		166 fps 205 fps Better texture detail.
+23%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		123 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+30% 		94.3 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 124%
Average Bench 98.3%

NVIDIA's RTX 2080 is based on its new Turing architecture which boasts new AI and ray tracing technology that could eventually result in better GPU performance. Unfortunately there are currently no games which can take advantage of these new capabilities. The early 2080 benchmarks only exhibit a modest (20%) performance improvement over the 1080 which considering the new price tag of $800 for the Founders Edition is hard to stomach. The 2080 features 2944 CUDA cores, a base/boost speed of 1515/1710 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. NVIDIA have also released the 2080 Ti which has marginally higher specs together with a jaw dropping price tag of $1200 for the Founders Edition. The RTX 2080 features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
316,424
254,908
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback