Real World Speed
Performance profile from 72,687 user samples
23,717 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 85% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 85% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 620
48,970 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 34% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 34% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 84th / 620
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
92.4 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+111%
43.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
274 fps Much better texture detail.
+60%
171 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+113%
103 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
263 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+117%
121 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+114%
82.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
304 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+57%
194 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
231 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+112%
109 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+115%
130 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+112%
89.1 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+18%
134 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+93%
63 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+58%
42 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+20%
132 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
109 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+46%
75 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+109%
43 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
+84%
57 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Hugely Better World of Tanks fps.
+127%
61 fps
Market Share
Based on 18,430,023 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.43 % Hugely higher market share.
+496%
0.24 %
Value
Value For Money
113 % Much better value.
+55%
73.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
83 % 97 % More popular.
+17%
Price
Price (score)
$270 $170 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
4 Months Hugely more recent.
+92%
49 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+128%
141 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+85%
136 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+141%
123 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+84%
128 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback