Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,172 user samples
60,664 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 627
13,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 42% Sapphire(174B E340) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 37% Gigabyte(1458 22C8)
Poor: 37% Great: 42%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+87%
39.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+104%
145 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+107%
107 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+83%
145 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+101%
160 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
236 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+111%
112 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+84%
152 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+9%
144 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+99%
67 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+59%
113 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
110 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+68%
65 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+106%
40 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,313,730 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.55 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,000%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
65 % Much better value.
+70%
38.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
144 % Hugely more popular.
+95%
74 %
Price
Price (score)
$272 $246 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Age
Newest
9 Months Hugely more recent.
+81%
48 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+78%
141 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+39%
218 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+110%
90.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps Much better reflection handling.
+77%
134 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Much better texture detail.
+40%
195 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+105%
85.8 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback