CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps +3% 232 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+51%
57 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+43%
69 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+41%
66 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+48%
81 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 231,299 user samples
70,009 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 69% Asus(1043 86A7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 630
161,290 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 45% MSI(1462 3413)
Poor: 45% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 630
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+43%
52 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps Much better lighting effects.
+67%
177 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+57%
140 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+39%
190 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+52%
212 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
236 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
147 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
213 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,624,567 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.58 % Hugely higher market share.
+151%
0.63 %
Value
Value For Money
64.4 % 107 % Much better value.
+66%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
146 % Much more popular.
+54%
95 %
Price
Price (score)
$274 $115 Much cheaper.
+58%
Age
Newest
10 Months Much more recent.
+77%
43 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+38%
182 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps +1% 300 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+42%
133 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+40%
169 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+5%
259 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
126 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback