Real World Speed
Performance profile from 195,802 user samples
49,113 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 625
146,689 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% MSI(1462 3413)
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 41% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
49.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
258 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+57%
140 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
264 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+40%
188 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
126 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
300 fps 300 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
147 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
213 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+43%
132 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps +3% 155 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+45%
93 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+63%
59 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+37%
55 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
172 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+8%
160 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+18%
95 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+61%
53 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+81%
158 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+22%
126 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+46%
68 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+35%
101 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,504,541 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % Hugely higher market share.
+92%
0.71 %
Value
Value For Money
67.2 % 84.5 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % Much more popular.
+43%
98 %
Price
Price (score)
$260 $140 Much cheaper.
+46%
Age
Newest
8 Months Hugely more recent.
+80%
41 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+38%
182 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps Much better lighting effects.
+63%
183 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+38%
171 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback