CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
214 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+31%
163 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
73 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+46%
50 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
87 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+45%
60 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+30%
61 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
99 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+46%
68 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 334,103 user samples
44,916 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
289,187 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3721)
Worst Bench: 48% Device(7377 0000) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+41%
52.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
274 fps Much better texture detail.
+43%
192 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+49%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
196 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+14%
154 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+40%
216 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
241 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
156 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
210 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+13%
168 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,880,131 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.42 % 1.84 % Higher market share.
+30%
Value
Value For Money
64.7 % 73.1 % Slightly better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % More popular.
+30%
101 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 $170 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
7 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+46%
220 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+33%
189 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps Much better lighting effects.
+47%
203 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+35%
175 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback