CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
245 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+11%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+33%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
119 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+43%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
117 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+48%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+30%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 875,953 user samples
645,160 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Asus(1043 868E)
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 3755)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 77th / 714
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
89.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
68.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
113 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
90.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
118 fps Better reflection handling.
+30%
90.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+106%
64.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
99.1 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
78.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
124 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+28%
97.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
164 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+36%
121 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+104%
68.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+29%
82.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,379,653 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.16 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
0.72 %
Value
Value For Money
65.6 % 113 % Much better value.
+73%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % More popular.
+14%
76 %
Price
Price (score)
$324 $143 Much cheaper.
+56%
Age
Newest
62 Months 60 Months +3%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
123 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+45%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.5 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+31%
74.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
109 fps Much better texture detail.
+44%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
90.6 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
70 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $35
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback