UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1660 vs RTX 2070

COMPARE

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Nvidia

Nvidia

BenchYourGPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	262 EFps	Better CSGO EFps. +19%	221 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	114 EFps	Much Better GTAV EFps. +58%	72 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	143 EFps	Much Better Overwatch EFps. +72%	83 EFps
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	137 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +73%	79 EFps
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	158 EFps	Much Better Fortnite EFps. +56%	101 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 708,910 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

478,117 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)

Poor: 93% Great: 112%

SPEED RANK: 60^th / 713

230,793 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)

Poor: 62% Great: 73%

SPEED RANK: 105^th / 713


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		104 %	Much faster effective speed. +52%		68.3 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	128 fps	Much better lighting effects. +42%	90.3 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	119 fps	Much better reflection handling. +31%	90.8 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	174 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +171%	64.2 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	125 fps	Much faster NBody calculation. +59%	78.4 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	143 fps	Much better peak lighting effects. +47%	97.1 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	170 fps	Much better peak reflection handling. +40%	121 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	187 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +173%	68.5 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	136 fps	Much faster peak NBody calculation. +64%	82.7 fps

Market Share

Based on 68,775,539 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	1.11 %	Much higher market share. +59%	0.7 %
Value Value For Money	123 %	Much better value. +59%	77.5 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	67 %		76 %	More popular. +13%
Price Price (score)	$200	+4%	$209


Age Newest	73 Months		68 Months	Slightly more recent. +7%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	145 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +71%	84.8 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	113 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +51%	74.6 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	129 fps	Much better texture detail. +70%	75.7 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	105 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +50%	70 fps

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards. ^{[Oct '18 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. ^{[Mar '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback