Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
217 EFps 221 EFps +2%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
78 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
120 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+45%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
116 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+47%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
128 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+27%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 343,524 user samples
112,731 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% XFX(1682 5710)
Poor: 77% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 88th / 713
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
83.5 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
68.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
106 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
90.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
121 fps Much better reflection handling.
+33%
90.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
96.9 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
64.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
118 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+51%
78.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
97.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
126 fps +4% 121 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
101 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+47%
68.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+49%
82.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,762,328 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.13 % 0.75 % Hugely higher market share.
+477%
Value
Value For Money
66 % 77.5 % Better value.
+18%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 76 % Much more popular.
+41%
Price
Price (score)
$300 $209 Much cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
57 Months More recent.
+16%
68 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
176 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+108%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.4 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
74.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
158 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+109%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.6 fps Faster complex splatting.
+12%
70 fps

The 6GB AMD 5600 XT is a slightly cheaper, BIOS restricted, version of the 8GB 5700. The majority of 5600 XT’s should operate reasonably quietly as the single fan reference design was skipped for this release. Although the reference design is absent there are, however, several variants which range in performance between the GTX 1660S and the RTX 2060. Performance is more varied than usual because of last minute BIOS changes. The best versions of the 5600 XT (Sapphire Pulse) were distributed to reviewers (good luck finding one of these at MSRP). These models are capable, with BIOS updates, of performance that almost matches the RTX 2060. At $280 USD the higher performing SKUs could make sense for users that are happy to tinker with or return faulty hardware. During our GTAV testing reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appears on several Navi and Vega cards). Whilst playing Project Cars 2 our 5600 XT PC crashed several times. Given the vast number of software (and hardware) problems since day one of the 5000 series launch, it’s ironic that AMD’s latest 20.1.3 driver does not even offer an option to skip the installation of a boatload of new system shortcuts, gimmicks and other bloatware. [Jan '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback