CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
220 EFps 221 EFps +0%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+35%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
133 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+60%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
125 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+58%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
143 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+42%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 158,488 user samples
44,865 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 82% ASRock(1849 5102) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 82% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 651
113,623 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 1067) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
90.3 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
71.9 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
113 fps Better lighting effects.
+23%
91.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
124 fps Much better reflection handling.
+34%
92.6 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
102 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+55%
65.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
112 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+40%
79.9 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
123 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+24%
98.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
138 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+10%
125 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
112 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+51%
74.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
122 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+42%
85.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 36,084,069 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.3 % 1.09 % Hugely higher market share.
+263%
Value
Value For Money
64.9 % 74.1 % Better value.
+14%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
147 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
138 %
Price
Price (score)
$330 $230 Much cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
16 Months More recent.
+20%
20 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
213 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+147%
86.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
91.4 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+19%
77.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
180 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+134%
76.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
68.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback