Real World Speed
Performance profile from 108,060 user samples
89,692 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% XFX(1682 C570) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 40% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 64th / 621
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.3 % 66 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
243 fps +1% 240 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps 147 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+10%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps 233 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps 171 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+39%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
281 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
264 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
142 fps 156 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
191 fps 246 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+29%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 182 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+38%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 127 fps +2%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
81 fps 119 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+48%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 73 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+19%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+32%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps 181 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+31%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps 103 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 60 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+21%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps 283 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+117%
Market Share
Based on 20,237,989 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.77 % Hugely higher market share.
+95%
0.91 %
Value
Value For Money
86.2 % Better value.
+21%
71.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % 142 % Much more popular.
+42%
Price
Price (score)
$130 Much cheaper.
+41%
$220
Age
Newest
29 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+79%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
198 fps 300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+52%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 232 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
175 fps 281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+61%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps 218 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback