Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
252 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+14%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
59 EFps 72 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+22%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
79 EFps 83 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps 79 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+13%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
84 EFps 101 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+20%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 591,144 user samples
360,351 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Worst Bench: 46% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 124th / 713
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
51.6 % 68.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+32%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
65.2 fps 90.3 fps Much better lighting effects.
+38%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
62.2 fps 90.8 fps Much better reflection handling.
+46%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.9 fps 64.2 fps +0%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
73.4 fps 78.4 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+7%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
72 fps 97.1 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+35%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.4 fps 121 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+82%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.3 fps 68.5 fps +0%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.5 fps 82.7 fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 68,763,419 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.12 % Much higher market share.
+51%
0.74 %
Value
Value For Money
93.7 % Better value.
+21%
77.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % +1% 76 %
Price
Price (score)
$131 Much cheaper.
+38%
$209
Age
Newest
91 Months 68 Months More recent.
+25%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.9 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.4 fps 74.6 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+51%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
88.4 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
46.4 fps 70 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+51%

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback