Real World Speed
Performance profile from 275,215 user samples
256,847 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 43% PowerColor(148C 2378)
Poor: 43% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 621
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
54 % 66 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
283 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
240 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
145 fps 147 fps +1%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps 233 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps 171 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+31%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
264 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
153 fps 156 fps +2%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
228 fps 246 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+8%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
138 fps 182 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
146 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
127 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 119 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+28%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 73 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+9%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 70 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+23%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps 181 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+27%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps 103 fps +4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps +2% 60 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
173 fps 283 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+64%
Market Share
Based on 20,225,621 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.96 % Hugely higher market share.
+222%
0.92 %
Value
Value For Money
78 % Slightly better value.
+10%
71.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
119 % 142 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$164 Cheaper.
+26%
$220
Age
Newest
29 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+79%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
227 fps 300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+32%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps 232 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+21%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps 281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+43%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
180 fps 218 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback