CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
252 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+14%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
59 EFps 72 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+22%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
79 EFps 83 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+5%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps 79 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+13%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
84 EFps 101 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+20%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 667,195 user samples
553,572 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% MSI(1462 3418)
Worst Bench: 48% MSI(1462 3418)
Poor: 48% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 75th / 651
113,623 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 1067) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
53.5 % 71.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+34%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
67.4 fps 91.9 fps Much better lighting effects.
+36%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
63.4 fps 92.6 fps Much better reflection handling.
+46%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.7 fps 65.9 fps +2%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
71.4 fps 79.9 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
76.6 fps 98.9 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
66.8 fps 125 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+87%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.3 fps 74.4 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.5 fps 85.7 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
Market Share
Based on 36,085,724 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.86 % Hugely higher market share.
+162%
1.09 %
Value
Value For Money
68.5 % 74.1 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % 138 % +1%
Price
Price (score)
$185 Cheaper.
+20%
$230
Age
Newest
43 Months 20 Months Much more recent.
+53%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
101 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
86.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
49.7 fps 77.1 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+55%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
90.6 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
76.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
47.2 fps 68.5 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 launched this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU which is based on a second generation Polaris architecture. The 580 is a refresh of the RX 480 which was released just 10 months ago. Modifications to the architecture have resulted in improved thermals and increased clock speeds by around 10%. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which is now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback