Real World Speed
Performance profile from 100,054 user samples
76,596 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% PowerColor(148C 2379)
Worst Bench: 51% Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 620
23,458 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 84% MSI(1462 375A)
Poor: 84% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 620
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
61.2 % 92.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+51%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
241 fps 275 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
135 fps 219 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+62%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps 262 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+51%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps 176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+44%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
282 fps 304 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
144 fps 230 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+60%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
194 fps 279 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+44%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 190 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+44%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 158 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+24%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
79 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+53%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps 94 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+52%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 67 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps 159 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+12%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92 fps 109 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51 fps 90 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+76%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72 fps 104 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+46%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84 fps 137 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+63%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps 272 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+70%
Market Share
Based on 18,447,393 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.77 % Higher market share.
+21%
1.46 %
Value
Value For Money
111 % 113 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
95 % Slightly more popular.
+14%
83 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 Much cheaper.
+44%
$270
Age
Newest
27 Months 4 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
199 fps 322 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 251 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
169 fps 296 fps Much better lighting effects.
+75%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
166 fps 236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+42%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback