Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,146 user samples
19,778 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% PowerColor(148C 2391) ≥ 4GB; Red Devil
Worst Bench: 51% XFX(1682 9587)
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 621
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
60.4 % 66 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
319 fps Much better texture detail.
+33%
240 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
158 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
147 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps 233 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
146 fps 171 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
361 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+37%
264 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
165 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
156 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
254 fps +3% 246 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
151 fps 182 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+21%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+21%
127 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 119 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+28%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
69 fps 73 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+6%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 70 fps +0%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
164 fps 181 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+11%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+5%
103 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+16%
60 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
205 fps 283 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+38%
Market Share
Based on 20,226,169 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.58 % 0.92 % Much higher market share.
+59%
Value
Value For Money
62.2 % 71.1 % Slightly better value.
+14%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
109 % 142 % Much more popular.
+30%
Price
Price (score)
$230 $220 +4%
Age
Newest
10 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
252 fps 300 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+19%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
213 fps 232 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps 281 fps Better lighting effects.
+27%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
204 fps 218 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback