CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
193 EFps 204 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+6%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
60 EFps 98 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+63%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
65 EFps 121 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+86%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps 102 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+46%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
74 EFps 134 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+81%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 778,878 user samples
747,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739)
Worst Bench: 51% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 625
31,408 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 102% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 102% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.2 % 114 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+102%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
212 fps 776 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+266%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps 236 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+59%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps 395 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+90%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps 356 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+118%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 866 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+261%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps 245 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
223 fps 423 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+90%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps 373 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+111%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,579 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.45 % Hugely higher market share.
+157%
1.73 %
Value
Value For Money
46.8 % 66.8 % Much better value.
+43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
127 % +2% 124 %
Price
Price (score)
$285 Cheaper.
+29%
$404
Age
Newest
40 Months 4 Months Hugely more recent.
+90%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
243 fps 441 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+81%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
210 fps 308 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+47%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps 401 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+81%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
194 fps 296 fps Much better reflection handling.
+53%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback