Real World Speed
Performance profile from 93,159 user samples
46,501 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC4) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 625
46,658 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 38% Sapphire(174B E349)
Poor: 38% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.6 % Much faster effective speed.
+67%
44.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
297 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+95%
152 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+68%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+66%
160 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
192 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
236 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+71%
138 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
278 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+52%
183 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+15%
139 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+61%
83 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+67%
57 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+54%
49 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
172 fps Better LoL Fps.
+29%
134 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+27%
88 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+75%
48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+163%
109 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Much Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+61%
96 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+100%
50 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+66%
82 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,741,787 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.45 % Hugely higher market share.
+339%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
67 % 84.4 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % Much more popular.
+55%
89 %
Price
Price (score)
$264 $126 Much cheaper.
+52%
Age
Newest
8 Months Much more recent.
+79%
39 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
250 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+45%
172 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
265 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
188 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+49%
126 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
235 fps Much better reflection handling.
+44%
163 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Better texture detail.
+20%
228 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+47%
120 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback