Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,797 user samples
11,648 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% EVGA(3842 1266) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 613
39,149 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 46% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 46% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
92.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+61%
57.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Better texture detail.
+21%
225 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+67%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
262 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
159 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
174 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
120 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
266 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
240 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+71%
140 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
282 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+53%
184 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+50%
127 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+14%
139 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+49%
86 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+61%
56 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+20%
143 fps
Market Share
Based on 17,003,553 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.24 % Hugely higher market share.
+300%
0.31 %
Value
Value For Money
113 % Better value.
+18%
95.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 106 % Much more popular.
+39%
Price
Price (score)
$270 $170 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
3 Months Hugely more recent.
+91%
33 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
324 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+68%
193 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+46%
173 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
298 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+94%
154 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Much better reflection handling.
+45%
163 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $355Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback