CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
245 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+7%
229 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
96 EFps 110 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+15%
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
119 EFps 138 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+16%
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
117 EFps 127 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+9%
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps 157 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+20%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 188,548 user samples
121,913 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% MSI(1462 3755)
Worst Bench: 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 76% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 635
66,635 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
85.2 % 106 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
334 fps 394 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
281 fps Faster multi rendering.
+18%
239 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
293 fps 400 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+37%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
371 fps 444 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
299 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+22%
246 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
317 fps 428 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
Market Share
Based on 23,913,598 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.73 % 2.09 % Higher market share.
+21%
Value
Value For Money
59.4 % 61.8 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
152 % More popular.
+24%
123 %
Price
Price (score)
$340 Cheaper.
+16%
$407
Age
Newest
12 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+50%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps 309 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
386 fps 873 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+126%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
201 fps 378 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+88%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
285 fps 294 fps +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
343 fps 785 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+129%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
185 fps 363 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+96%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play on or below 1080p. For gamers that play on 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback