Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps 262 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+19%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps 114 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+58%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps 143 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+72%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 137 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+73%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps 158 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+56%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 708,910 user samples
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.3 % 104 % Much faster effective speed.
+52%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
90.3 fps 128 fps Much better lighting effects.
+42%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.8 fps 119 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.2 fps 174 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+171%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.4 fps 125 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+59%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.1 fps 143 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+47%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
121 fps 170 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+40%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.5 fps 187 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+173%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.7 fps 136 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+64%
Market Share
Based on 68,773,250 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.7 % 1.1 % Much higher market share.
+57%
Value
Value For Money
77.5 % 123 % Much better value.
+59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % More popular.
+13%
67 %
Price
Price (score)
$209 $200 +4%
Age
Newest
68 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
73 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
84.8 fps 145 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+71%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.6 fps 113 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+51%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
75.7 fps 129 fps Much better texture detail.
+70%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70 fps 105 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+50%

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback