Real World Speed
Performance profile from 81,976 user samples
40,874 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% PNY(196E 1332) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 59% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 634
41,102 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 20% Gigabyte(1458 22DD)
Poor: 20% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 134th / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
62.9 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+192%
21.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
278 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+278%
73.6 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+131%
63.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+202%
77.2 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
298 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+240%
87.6 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
152 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+132%
65.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
245 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+186%
85.8 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+10%
117 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
120 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+133%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
76 Fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+93%
39 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
183 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+63%
113 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+72%
59 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
63 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+97%
32 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
306 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+215%
97 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 Fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+94%
67 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+152%
46 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,709,969 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+425%
0.2 %
Value
Value For Money
71 % Much better value.
+46%
48.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
132 % Much more popular.
+65%
80 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $105 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
10 Months Much more recent.
+76%
41 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
230 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+173%
84.3 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
263 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+127%
116 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
181 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+125%
80.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+175%
79.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
238 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+133%
102 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+118%
78.1 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback